Police, Court Records & Bushrangers
19th Century News
Newspaper articles that offer insights into life in Bothwell during the 1800s.
Sources Used: TROVE. https://trove.nla.gov.au; FamilySearch: Australia, Tasmania, Government Gazette, 1833-1925. https://www.familysearch.org.
⚠️ Accidents ⛪ Church & Community
📰 Country News 🏏 Cricket
⚰️ Deaths, Inquests & Obituaries
🌧️ Floods, Fires & Storms 🏛️ Municipal Council
👮 Police, Court Reports & Bushrangers
🎯 Rifle Club 🛤️ Road Trust
🏫 School News ✒️ Testimonials
CASH, KAVANAGH & JONES. On Wednesday last, 22 March 1843, they paid a visit to the farm of Mr John Sherwin, of Sherwood, about seven o'clock in the evening. Mr Sherwin was taking his tea in company with Mr Propsting, of Hobart Town, Mr Henry Propsting, and a young man named Paine, when a servant of Mr Sherwin's, named Smith, came into the room, followed by Cash with a double-barrelled gun, who immediately presented his piece and threatened them with instant death if they stirred. In a few minutes after Jones appeared driving in some of the assigned servants, who were ordered to sit down, and ten minutes after this Kavenagh drove in the rest of the men, together with a stranger from one of the farms in the neighbourhood. They were all tied together with cords and handkerchiefs. The bushrangers then demanded the keys, which Mr Sherwin took out of a drawer and delivered up. One of them (supposed to be Jones) went out with the keys while the other two kept guard, and soon after Jones returned, bringing several articles which he had collected, and placing them in a corner of the hall. Cash enquired what fire-arms there were, and also demanded Mr Propsting's money, who delivered up ten or twelve shillings, having, during the time occupied in bringing in and placing the servants, managed to conceal his watch and other cash, which thus escaped notice. Jones took Mr Sherwin's watch from his pocket, but returned it to him again. The freebooters took also a few shillings out of a desk. One of the bushrangers then asked for spirits, and made the servant Smith proceed with him to the cellar, from which he returned with a bucket full of wine, some of which they drank and gave the remainder to the men. The three bushrangers then gathered up the articles thrown by Jones in the hall, and went off with the usual threat of shooting any one of the party who attempted to stir. Kavenagh came back in a few minutes with a shawl belonging to Mr Propsting, which he said he had taken away by mistake. They carried off several shirts and pairs of stockings, a duelling and a pocket pistol, a single-barrelled rifle, a black hat, a pair of boots, some tobacco, bread and butter. Previously to their robbing Mr Sherwin's house, the bushrangers had fallen in with one of Mr George Sherwin's assigned servants, the man mentioned in the above account as named Smith, whom they questioned closely as to the premises, and whether or not there were any constables, as they had been given to understand, lying alongside of the fences. The bushrangers are described as each being armed with a double-barrelled gun and a brace of pistols.
THE STATE PRISONER. Information has reached the town of the escape of Mr John Mitchel, the Irish State Prisoner, who was residing upon ticket-of-leave parole at Bothwell. The particulars of the case, as far as we are aware of, are as follows:- Mr Mitchel waited a day or two ago upon Mr Davies, the Assistant Police Magistrate of Bothwell, with a letter which contained the resignation of his parole of honour, and he offered to place himself in the custody of the police. While Mr Davies was perusing the letter, Mr Mitchel abruptly left the office, and proceeding outside, where two fleet horses were in waiting, rode off at full speed, accompanied by a gentleman supposed by the police to be Mr W. L. Smyth, the correspondent of the New York Tribune. He has not been heard of since. Mr Martin, another of the State prisoners residing in the same district, has since reported himself to be at his authorised place of residence. This is the fourth of the Irish State prisoners who have escaped from the island.
The following letter, which narrates the particulars of the escape of John Mitchel, the Irish State Prisoner, from the Bothwell district, is published according to the wish of the individual whom it most concerns. It will be seen that the information formerly given in the Courier was generally correct.
June 9th, 1853. My dear ______, I entrust to you a short narrative of a transaction which occurred this afternoon in Bothwell. Some of the Hobart Town newspapers, or the Launceston Examiner, will perhaps do me the courtesy to publish it. Finding that warrants had been actually issued some weeks ago against me as an absconder, under which warrants a gentleman was hunted like a wild beast, and even taken prisoner by mistake, as John Mitchel an absconder - while I was all the time quietly living at my cottage, and under parole of honour not to abscond, - I felt outraged by this insult. I had not reclaimed my parole, had intimated no intention of reclaiming it, and perceiving how little value the convict authorities placed upon that security, and how little respect they paid it (though it has been my only fetter for three years), I resolved to withdraw it in due form, and let them try how they could hold me without it. I therefore addressed the following note to the Lieutenant-Governor:
Bothwell, 8th June, 1853.
"Sir, I hereby resign the 'comparative liberty' which is called ticket-of-leave, and revoke my parole of honour. In pursuance of this determination, I shall forthwith present myself before the Police Magistrate of Bothwell, at his Police Office, show him this letter, and offer myself to be taken into custody.
I remain, Sir, your obedient servant, John Mitchel."
This day (Thursday), being post-day from Bothwell, I rode into the village, accompanied by my friend _____, went to the Police Office (where, as usual, a constable was on guard outside the door), walked into the Magistrate's room, where I found the Police Magistrate and Police Clerk; and, addressing the former, said, "Sir, I have written to the Lieutenant-Governor, and have thought it right to show you a copy of my note," placing it in his hands. He said, "Am I to read it?" - "If you please," I replied, "it was for that purpose I gave it to you." He then looked at the letter for a moment. "The purport of that note," I said, "Is very plain - you see, it is to revoke my parole." He looked at me as if for further explanation, so I repeated what I had said. "You observe my parole is now at an end, and I am here that you may take me into custody." Then, feeling that my business there was done, and that he had the opportunity which I was bound to allow him, I turned, and, after wishing the Magistrate good morning, put on my hat and left the room. The moment I was out of the office door, and while I was still in the passage, he and the clerk made a loud outcry, calling on the Chief Constable (whose office is at the other side of the passage) to secure me. The constable who officiates as clerk to the District Constable immediately rushed out, calling on me to stop. The other constable on guard at the door had fortunately occupied himself in holding two horses, so that my friend and myself passed him without the necessity of using any violence, and we were instantly in our saddles. I did not see the District Constable at all. This is precisely and accurately what passed. Once mounted, we stayed no further parley, but rode off; and it is outside the purpose of my present writing to tell you any more.
Yours very much, John Mitchel.
22nd September, 1856. Four ruinous buildings at Bothwell formerly occupied by the Police, consisting of a quantity of boards, slabs, logs, laths and shingles - also a quantity of boards and battens, forming part of a fence round one of the buildings known as the Old Watchhouse, will be sold by me by public auction, at Bothwell, on Wednesday, the 15th day of October next, at 12 o'clock noon; and the same must be cleared away within six days from the day of sale. John McGinnes, Chief District Constable.
A burglary was committed at the residence of Thomas Axford Esq., at Thorpe, during the night of the 15th inst., or rather as Paddy says "about 2 o'clock in the morning" of the 16th.
It appears that about half-past 2 o'clock, Miss E. D. Holland, who has charge of Mr Axford's children, was suddenly awoke from her sleep, and found a man in her bedroom ransacking her box; she immediately jumped out of bed and commenced screaming for assistance, at the same time rushed towards the door, when the fellow picked up her box, and walked off with it, pushing Miss Holland back into the bedroom, and turning the key of the door, which happened to be outside, locked her in. Miss Holland then proceeded to the window with the intention of jumping out, when to her astonishment she found another vagabond with an opossum skin rug on his shoulders pacing up and down in front of it. Miss Holland then heard the man whom she had first seen, in Mr Axford's bedroom opposite, apparently at the drawers, at which it was afterwards discovered that he had been, but without taking anything away.
A Mrs Wilby who slept upstairs, hearing the young lady's cries, ran down and was just in time to see the man leaving the hall with Mr Axford's government Enfield rifle; with great courage she seized hold of the rifle, when the villain turned round and struck her a blow with his fist on the nose, causing the blood to flow profusely. She stuck to the rifle, however, which the fellow at length allowed to remain in her hands, perhaps thinking that the possession of it might more readily lead to his detection. He then left, and Mrs Wilby ran down in her night clothes to Mr Taylor's at the mill for assistance. Both scoundrels decamped in the meantime; but it is much to be regretted that, notwithstanding Mr Quodling and his constables, who proceeded in pursuit within a couple of hours afterwards, which was as early as he was apprised of the matter, even going himself as far as Oatlands and back the same day, no tidings have as yet been obtained of the men. The only plunder taken away were nine sovereigns and a half belonging to Miss Holland, contained in a little box within her work box, which was kept in her trunk.
Unfortunately, Mr Axford was away at the time at the Lakes, which no doubt was well known to the villains; otherwise they would not have ventured, in all probability, to attack his house.
Saturday, 13th May, 1876. Before the Warden, Alexander Reid and William Nicholas, Esquires, J.P.'s.
Henry Craig, jnr, and William Lewis were charged, on information of Mr Alfred Ibbott, with having trespassed on his land at Ibbott Vale, without reasonable or lawful excuse, and without his consent, contrary to "The Trespass to Lands Act."
Both parties pleaded guilty. Mr Ibbott stated that a lot of young men, with dogs and guns, were continually trespassing on his land late at night; upon this occasion the defendants, together with others in company, had no less than six dogs with them on his lambing run. The Bench fined each of the defendants 5s, together with costs, 7s 3d.
William Batt was charged at the Bothwell Police office on Monday, 13th inst., by Mr Perkins, Superintendent of Police, with having on Sunday, the 5th inst., feloniously stolen five cows, of the value of £20, the property of Charles Lacey. On the application of Mr Perkins, he was remanded till the 18th inst. The case, so far as I can ascertain, is of a daring nature. Lacey, who is a farmer in a small way, resides about ten miles from Bothwell, and has five quiet milch cows in full milk. On the morning of 5th inst., he went as usual to get his cows from a small paddock for the purpose of milking them, but could not find them. After looking in vain all day, he reported them to the police as having been stolen. Mr Perkins went at once to make inquiries, and finding without doubt they had been stolen, he somehow got on their track, and it appears kept on it, for after being in pursuit for six days he returned home, not only with the cattle but the prisoner Batt. I certainly think that Mr Perkins deserves great credit for his perseverance, particularly as he went alone.
Thomas Taylor was charged by the Superintendent of Police with having on the 1st March instant, stolen a bottle of cloves the value of two shillings from Mr W. North, of the Castle Inn. Prisoner pleaded guilty and was sentenced to three months’ imprisonment with hard labour.
At the Police Court on Saturday, 9th inst., before Mr A. McDowall, Warden, and Mr A. Mandeville, J.P., James Jones was charged with using indecent language in a public street. Plea guilty. The Warden condemned in strong words the use of bad language in the streets, and said he was determined to put it down. This being Jones' first offence, he was fined 5s. Matthew Branch was charged, on the complaint of the Superintendent of Police, with a breach of the Education Act in not sending his two daughters, Effie and Rose, to school, in accordance with the rules of the said Act. Defendant pleaded not guilty. After the evidence of Mr Perkins, and the production of the head master's report, the accused was found guilty and fined 5s. Walter Reardon was charged on a similar information, but he satisfied their Worships that his children's absence from school was no fault of his, and the charge was withdrawn.